Information Security Policy (Public Version)

Information Security Policy (Public Version) 

Version: 1.0 

Date: March 2025 

Approved by: Chief Executive Officer 

 

1. Purpose 

The Learning Resources Group (TLRG) is committed to protecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information entrusted to us. This policy outlines our high-level commitment to information security for clients, partners, and stakeholders. 

2. Scope 

This statement applies to all TLRG services, systems, and processes that support our operations, including our SaaS platforms and associated client services. 

3. Commitment to Information Security 

TLRG leadership ensures that: 
- Information security is aligned with our business objectives and strategic direction. 
- Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements (including the Privacy Act 1988 and the Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme) are satisfied. 
- Risk management, monitoring, and continual improvement are built into our systems and processes. 
- Resources are allocated to maintain secure, resilient, and reliable services. 
- All staff and contractors are aware of their responsibilities for safeguarding information. 

4. Information Security Objectives 

Our objectives are to: 
1. Maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of information assets. 
2. Protect client data from unauthorised access, alteration, or loss. 
3. Ensure continuity of service for clients and partners. 
4. Continually improve our information security management system (ISMS). 

5. Governance and Review 

This policy is approved by TLRG’s Chief Executive Officer and is subject to periodic review to ensure it remains current and effective. Updates will be published as required. 

For further information or to request additional details, please contact TLRG’s management team via the official contact channels. 

News

view all news

Read More

Competency Isn’t Enough: Rethinking Digital Skills in 2026

Competency-based training still matters, but on its own, it’s not enough for digital skills. It does a great job of proving someone can perform a task under known conditions. The problem is that digital environments don’t stay consistent. Tools change, workflows shift, and AI introduces new layers of complexity. Learners can be “competent” in training and still struggle when those conditions change.

The gap isn’t in effort or ability; it’s in underlying understanding. That’s where capability comes in. Capability is what allows someone to adapt, question outputs, and transfer their skills into new or unfamiliar systems. It’s what keeps performance intact when the environment evolves. The takeaway is simple:

Keep competency as the outcome & start building capability as the method.

That shift is what turns short-term success into long-term effectiveness.

There’s nothing inherently wrong with competency-based training. In fact, it’s one of the strongest features of the Australian VET system. It gives us clarity. It defines expectations. It creates a shared understanding of what “good” looks like in the workplace.

But when it comes to digital skills, something isn’t quite lining up anymore.

Not in a dramatic, system-breaking way. More in the quiet, familiar sense that learners can complete the training, tick the boxes, and still feel uncertain when they hit the workplace. Or worse—they feel confident right up until the moment something changes.

And in digital environments, something always changes.